- First edition
- Second edition
- Third edition
- Fourth edition
- Fifth and sixth editions
- Supplement to the fourth, fifth, and sixth editions
- Seventh edition
- Eighth edition
- Ninth edition
- Tenth edition
- Eleventh edition and its supplements
- Fourteenth edition
- Corporate change
- Fifteenth edition
- Britannica in the digital era
Supplement to the fourth, fifth, and sixth editions
The six-volume Supplement to the fourth, fifth, and sixth editions appeared in half-volumes from 1815 to 1824, edited by MacVey Napier (1776–1847), who later became editor of the Edinburgh Review and professor of conveyancing at the University of Edinburgh. Constable had known Napier from 1798 as one who “had been a hard student, and at college laid a good foundation for his future career, though more perhaps in general information than in what would be, strictly speaking, called scholarship.” Constable had chosen well, for Napier’s energy and vision as an editor matched the ambitions of the dynamic “Napoleon of publishing.” Looking beyond Edinburgh, Napier visited London and obtained the cooperation of eminent literary figures there.
The Supplement was a new venture in more ways than one: almost all the articles were original signed contributions; their authors included some of the most distinguished British scholars of the day, as well as some French ones; and three dissertations on the progress of the philosophy of mind and matter since the Renaissance were added outside the alphabetical series.
A selection of notable contributors to the Supplement to the fourth, fifth, and six editions is provided in the table.
|Jean-Baptiste Biot||Electricity; Pendulum|
|Thomas Robert Malthus||Population|
|James Mill||Colony; Government; Law of Nations|
|David Ricardo||Funding System|
|Peter Mark Roget||Cranioscopy; Kaleidoscope|
|Sir Walter Scott, 1st Baronet||Chivalry; Drama; Romance|
These dissertations were planned by Constable before he even appointed the editor in 1813. Dugald Stewart, professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh, suggested to Constable in 1812 that the Supplement should contain dissertations corresponding to D’Alembert’s discourse prefixed to the Encyclopédie, and he undertook to write the first. This was to be “Exhibiting a General view of the Progress of Metaphysical, Ethical, and Political Philosophy, Since the Revival of Letters in Europe,” but, because of ill health, he completed only the first part (to the end of the 17th century) and the second part (metaphysics in the 18th century). The second dissertation, “Exhibiting a General View of the Progress of Mathematical and Physical Science Since the Revival of Letters in Europe,” was also left incomplete, after treating Newton, because of the death of the author, John Playfair, professor of natural philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. The third dissertation, by William Thomas Brande, professor of chemistry in the Royal Institution of Great Britain, was “Exhibiting a General View of the progress of Chemical philosophy from the early ages to the end of the eighteenth century.”
The editor’s preface gave an outline of contents of the Supplement, under the heads of Pure Mathematics, Natural Philosophy Chemistry, Natural History, Medicine, Arts and Manufactures, Philosophy of the Mind, Political Philosophy, “the three connected provinces of Geography, Statistics, and Topography,” which “occupy the largest portion of the present work,” History, and Biography. All the treatises and articles in the Supplement were listed at the end of the sixth volume.
Geographical and topographical entries included descriptive entries on the counties of Great Britain and various countries of the world as well as new treatises (indicated by crossheads) on areas and lands recently explored, such as “Australasia” and “Polar Seas.” The treatise “Population,” among the addenda to the sixth volume, reprinted the government abstract of the 1821 census for England and Wales.
History was brought up to date, but space (and no doubt time also) forbade the rewriting of the history already provided in previous editions. The new biographies, about 160 in number, were chiefly on men who had died during the previous 30 years, such as Victor Alfieri (Vittorio, Count Alfieri), James Boswell, and Immanuel Kant. There are, however, a few on Arab authors previously omitted, among them Abulfeda (Abū al-Fidā?) and Alhazen (Ibn al-Haytham).
In other fields of knowledge, both theoretical and practical, there were treatises on various subjects not previously treated, as well as new information on subjects already familiar. Bibliographies were sometimes provided, though not regularly. The Supplement was intended to be a useful purchase in its own right, as well as a necessary adjunct to the main work. Part of its success was due to the fact that Constable was prepared to pay for expert contributions: Stewart received some ￡1,500 for the two parts of his dissertation.
After the preface there was a key to the signatures of 72 named contributors. A few, however, preferred anonymity, like the “Gentleman of Glasgow, well informed on the subject of steam navigation,” who was largely responsible for the relevant treatise. Two of the most distinguished contributors who undertook a considerable number of subjects were James Mill and Thomas Young. Among Mill’s treatises were “Colony” and “Government” together with the new entries “Caste,” “Economists,” “Jurisprudence,” “Liberty of the Press,” and “Nations, Law of.” The versatility of Thomas Young is shown by a sample of his contributions: “Chromatics,” “Egypt” (including plates of hieroglyphics explained), “Fluents,” “Herculaneum,” “Hydraulics,” “Languages,” “Richard Porson,” “Tides,” and “Weights and Measures.”
Sir Walter Scott wrote “Chivalry,” “Drama,” and “Romance”; William Hazlitt contributed “Arts, Fine,” “Bulfinger (George Bernard),” and “Burger (Godfrey Augustus)”; and Francis Jeffrey of the Edinburgh Review undertook “Beauty,” “John Playfair,” and the eulogy appended to the anonymous biography of the engineer James Watt. The treatises “Deaf and Dumb,” “Kaleidoscope,” and “Physiology” are among those by Peter M. Roget, best known for his Thesaurus. The French physicist Jean-Baptiste Biot wrote “Electricity,” “Galvanism,” and “Pendulum,” and his compatriot Fran?ois Arago produced “Double Refraction and Polarization of Light” in time for the addenda to the sixth volume. “Population” was written by Thomas Robert Malthus and “Funding System” by David Ricardo. A less well-known contributor was Robert Louis Stevenson’s grandfather, Robert Stevenson, who wrote “An Account of the Bell Rock Light-House,” which he had himself built, and “Caledonian Canal.”
Most entries were signed. The unsigned treatises “Balance of Power” and “Bibliography” were claimed in the seventh edition (where they were reprinted) as the editor’s work. A few entries on geographical subjects were acknowledged to be taken from The Edinburgh Gazetteer, or Geographical Dictionary (1822), also published by Constable. Constable died in 1827, the year after the bankruptcy of his firm in which Scott was also involved. He had long before planned that Napier would edit a seventh edition incorporating the Supplement.
During the period that elapsed between 1830, when the first monthly part of the seventh edition appeared, and 1902–03, when the 10th edition was published, the Encyclop?dia Britannica was established as a major indexed work of reference covering all branches of knowledge with the collaboration of named experts, which was brought up to date from time to time in further editions. Within that period there were notable changes, not least the transfer of ownership of the work to the United States, but the seventh edition fixed the basic form of the encyclopaedia thenceforward.
After Constable’s bankruptcy and death, the Encyclopaedia Britannica was bought by Adam Black, another Edinburgh publisher, for whom Napier edited the seventh edition. Its 21 volumes, comprising 17,011 pages and 506 plates, appeared in parts from 1830 to 1842 and were a revision of previous editions, incorporating the Supplement and a number of newly commissioned articles. An extra volume provided the useful innovation of a general index, which became a standard feature of all further editions.
Napier retained the dissertations written for the Supplement by Stewart and Playfair, but he dropped the one on chemistry by Brande. Stewart’s dissertation was supplemented by a new one titled “Exhibiting a General View of the Progress of Ethical Philosophy Chiefly During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth centuries” by Sir James Mackintosh, who died before he could include political philosophy. This became the second dissertation, Playfair’s took third place, and the fourth was newly written by Sir John Leslie, professor of natural philosophy at the University of Edinburgh, titled “Exhibiting a General View of the Progress of Mathematical and Physical Science Chiefly During the Eighteenth century.” These four dissertations filled the first volume.
Napier’s preface described the relationship between the seventh edition and what had preceded it: “every article of value in any preceding edition has been reprinted in this—in all cases with corrections and frequently with considerable additions.” The contents of the Supplement were mostly reprinted in the seventh edition, “all the principal treatises having been previously revised by their authors where that was possible, and altered, or corrected, wherever circumstances required such changes.” Napier further specified various fields in which new articles appeared, such as religion, philosophy, chemistry, civil engineering, Asian geography, and biography. After having edited the Supplement, Napier had an unrivaled acquaintance with the contents of the encyclopaedia, and he was assisted by an Edinburgh advocate named James Browne, who also contributed many signed entries.
The seventh edition continued the Supplement’s more liberal use of crossheads and extended them even to biographical articles. The distinction between articles and treatises was thus no longer visually apparent, but the original plan of treating major subjects in some detail was followed. A new development was the introduction of text figures in treatises such as “Geometry,” “Mechanics,” and “Drawing.” Enough maps to make a complete atlas were placed where relevant throughout the work.
The preface included a key to the signatures of nearly 170 contributors, as well as a list of those articles (mostly reprinted from former editions), together with the names of their authors, to which signatures were omitted in the text. Scott’s “Romance” was retained, with an additional section on modern romance and the novel. Thomas De Quincey wrote the biographies of Goethe, Schiller, Pope, and Shakespeare. “Alphabet” and “Antiquities” were the work of Thomas Jefferson Hogg. Benjamin Haydon undertook “Painting,” and T.C. Hansard provided “Printing” and “Typefounding.” Many entries, including most of the shorter articles, still remained unsigned.